The piece of media I have chosen to discuss is Worm, a web serial by J.C.McCrae.
Worm was designed as a deconstruction of superhero tropes, and attempts to scientifically back those tropes within the context of its world. It ran from 2011 to 2013, with chapter updates twice a week, and totalled out at 1.6 million words at its end.
One of the tropes Worm aims to deconstruct is the idea of an origin story. This is expressed through the concept of trigger events, traumatic events in a person’s life which make them susceptible to the force that creates superpowers in the story. This in particular is pertinent to the subject of this piece, because the story at several points takes a note of the statistics of trigger events. McCrae suggests that, the world over, women would be more likely to experience a trigger event, as they experience a statistically higher amount of trauma in less socially developed parts of the world.
As a result of this the story features a significantly higher number of female characters who are central to the plot than most, including its main protagonist.
At the very beginning, Worm reads as not much more than a largely inoffensive high school drama story, mixed in with maybe the possibility of a power fantasy plot. But as McCrae finds his footing with the writing, the story accelerates away from this setting, even making a concentrated effort to distance itself from it, and our protagonist becomes more interesting and perhaps less sympathetic.
Taylor Hebert is a bullied teenager who one day finds herself with the ability to control bugs. There are so many ways this can be done wrong. But by moving away from the high school setting the character is given a much better chance to shine on her own merits and be unique and separate from perhaps any character in all of fiction.
When we open the story Taylor is just as optimistic and naive as perhaps any protagonist in a world as big as this one, aspiring to join the heroes and put away criminals, but she decides at some point that the red tape surrounding the heroes is impossible to work with and so she jumps into bed with the villains instead. What we see next is the actions of a brutal pragmatist described through the eyes of that same naive optimist. The early story has tricked us into believing that Taylor Hebert is better than all the other villains because we still haven’t made the connection between the sympathetic character and the one who kills and maims to maintain territory and serve the greater good.
I think you could argue that this portrayal and this character dissonance has everything to do with gender. It’s designed to trick people enamoured with the ‘geek girl’ stereotype, and who perhaps fall in love with a character without knowing anything of the underlying personality. Which isn’t to say that Taylor Hebert is a strictly unlikable character. Her intentions throughout the whole story remain pure, even if her actions grow increasingly brutal and barbaric. Through the whole story she thrives on escalation and conflict, leading all the way up to a climax where her pragmatism and sacrifice makes her responsible for a nightmare of Lovecraftian proportions.
They could have made Taylor Hebert a good person, and they could have made her a bad person. Either would have been trying too hard. The Taylor Hebert we end up with is just a person. Like anyone else.